This article compares the two best smartphones under 25000, We going to see a comparison between the new Vivo Y200 5G and Samsung A52 5G smartphone by Vivo and Samsung.
Let’s compare the Vivo Y200 5G smartphone and the Samsung A52 5G devices and find the best device among the two.
Vivo Y200 5G vs Samsung A52 5G
Going to start with displays equipped in both smartphones, the Vivo Y200 5G features a 6.67 big screen size and offers an AMOLED display. The Samsung A52 5G offers a 6.5 screen size and features a super AMOLED display with HDR10+ support. Both devices support a 120Hz fast refresh rate with 800 nits of peak brightness and feature the same screen resolution of 1080 × 2400 pixels.
Talking about the processor, the Vivo Y200 smartphone is powered by Qualcomm snapdragon 4 Gen 1 chipset with a primary clock speed of 2.0 GHz. However, the Samsung A52 5G even though it launched in 2021 in terms of performance Samsung likely to perform better than the vivo Y200. As Samsung A52 5G smartphone packs with Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset with a fast clock speed of 2.2GHz.
Coming to storage part, The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G packs three storage variants 128GB storage with 6GB RAM or 8GB RAM and 256GB storage with 8GB RAM. whereas the Vivo Y200 5G features a single storage option of 128GB storage and 8GB RAM.
About the camera setup of both smartphones, the Vivo features a dual rear camera setup, and the Samsung A52 5G offers a quad camera setup of a 64MP main camera, a 12MP ultrawide camera, a 5MP macro sensor, and a 5MP depth sensor with a 32MP high-resolution selfie camera. The Vivo Y200 5G has a 64MP primary main camera and a 2MP depth sensor with a 16MP selfie camera.
Regarding connectivity the Vivo Y200 and Samsung A52 support under-display fingerprint sensor but there is a difference in Bluetooth connectivity, the Vivo Y200 5G support Bluetooth 5.1 while the Samsung A52 5G has Bluetooth 5.0.
Talking about the battery backup, Vivo Y200 offers a slightly big battery of 4800mAh non-removable battery, and supports 44w fast wired charging that can charge Vivo Y200 1-50% in 28 minutes. The Samsung A52 5G smartphone houses a 4500mAh non-removable battery and supports 25w wired charging that can charge 50% in 30 minutes.
Final verdict, After comparing both smartphones side by side it is clear the Samsung A52 5G smartphone is better than the Vivo Y200 5G. however, the Vivo smartphone camera specs are not up to the mark but the photos and colors are better than the Samsung Y200.
- Vivo Y200 5G vs iQoo Z7 Pro: Find the Best Smartphone Under 25000
- Vivo T2 Pro Full Specification | Best Camera & Gaming phone under 25000
Vivo Y200 5G vs Samsung A52 5G Specs
|Release Date||23 October 2023||17 March 2021|
|Dimensions||162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in)||159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)|
|Weight||190 g||189 g|
|Wi-Fi||Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band||Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct|
|Bluetooth||5.1, A2DP, LE||5.0, A2DP, LE|
|Chipset||Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm)||Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)|
|Primary Clock Speed||Octa-core (2×2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6×1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)||Octa-core (2×2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 570)|
|Operating System||Android 13, Funtouch 13||Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1|
|GPU||Adreno 619||Adreno 619|
|Display||AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak)||Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM)|
|Screen Size||6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio)||6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)|
|Screen Resolutions||1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)||1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density)|
|Rear Camera||64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS|
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
|64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X”, 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS|
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
5 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
|Front Camera||16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)||32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8″, 0.8µm|
|Storage||128GB 8GB RAM||128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM|
|Fingerprint Sensor||Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor||Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor|
|Battery Capacity||Li-Ion 4800 mAh, non-removable||Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable|
|Fast Charger||44W wired, 1-50% in 28 min (advertised)||25W wired, 50% in 30 min (advertised)|