Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Vivo Y200 5G: Vivo launched Vivo Y200 5G smartphone in the market to compete with other brands of smartphones under 25000 5g. As the new Vivo Y200 comes under the 25000 price point the best competitor is Motorola Edge 40 Neo which was also launched a month ago.
This article will compare the Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone and the Vivo Y200 5G device and find the best mobile under 25000 5g with the best camera and specifications.
Let’s compare the Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Vivo Y200 5G smartphone, starting with the display.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Vivo Y200 5G
First, when we start with the display equipped in both smartphones, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone screen size is 6.55 inches, which is a P-OLED display and offers 144Hz fast refresh rate with HDR10+ support. On the other hand, the new Vivo Y200 5G features a big screen size of 6.67 inches with an AMOLED panel that offers a 120Hz refresh rate and supports 800 nits of brightness.
Talking about the processor, Both smartphone features a 6nm chipset. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone is powered by Mediatek Dimensity 7030 chipset with a fast primary clock speed of 2.5 GHz. whereas the Vivo Y200 houses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 chipset with 2.0 GHz. In terms of performance, no doubt Edge 40 Neo, taking the lead with better performance and fast core speed.
In storage and RAM, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone offers two storage variants 128GB storage and 8GB RAM, 256GB storage and 12GB RAM. On the other hand Vivo Y200 5G has only a single storage option of 128GB storage and 8GB RAM.
Coming to the camera setup of both smartphones, At the rear both devices feature a dual rear camera setup. The Edge 40 Neo smartphone features a 50MP main camera and a 13MP ultrawide camera along with a 32MP high-resolution selfie camera. At the same time, the new Vivo Y200 5G packs a 64MP main camera sensor and a 2MP depth camera with a 16MP selfie camera.
About the connectivity, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone and the Vivo Y200 5G smartphone come with an under-display fingerprint sensor but will find a difference in the Bluetooth connectivity of both devices, the Edge 40 Neo offers Bluetooth 5.4 and on the other hand Vivo Y200 features Bluetooth 5.1.
Finally, regarding the battery backup of both devices, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone houses a 5000mAH big non-removable battery and supports 68w fast wired charging, while the Vivo Y200 5G smartphone packs 4800mAh non-removable battery and supports 44w wired charging.
Final verdict, After comparing both smartphones side-by-side it is clear Motorola Edge 40 Neo smartphone is better than the Vivo Y200. In terms of camera, storage, display, and battery backup Motorola Edge 40 Neo is better than the Vivo Y200 5G.
Also, Read
- Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5G Full Specifications | Best Gaming Phone under 25000
- Vivo Y200 5G vs iQoo Z7 Pro: Find the Best Smartphone Under 25000
Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Vivo Y200 5G Specs
General
Release Date | 14 September 2023 | 23 October 2023 |
Dimensions | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
Weight | 170 g | 190 g |
Connectivity
Network Connectivity | 2G,3G,4G,5G | 2G,3G,4G,5G |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
Processor
Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) |
Primary Clock Speed | Octa-core (2×2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2×2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6×1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
Operating System | Android 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
Display
Display | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) |
Screen Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
Screen Resolutions | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
Refresh rate | 144Hz | 120Hz |
Camera
Rear Camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.5″, 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
Front Camera | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
Storage
Storage | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor | Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor | Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor |
Accelerometer | Yes | Yes |
Proximity Sensor | Yes | Yes |
Gyroscope | Yes | Yes |
Barometer | No | No |
Compass | Yes | Yes |
Battery
Battery Capacity | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4800 mAh, non-removable |
Fast Charger | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min (advertised) | 44W wired, 1-50% in 28 min (advertised) |